A Right-Sized HR Operating Model for Current Scale
An industrial holding company whose HR function was administered out of finance by a three-person team.
We designed an HR function sized to the company as it is today, and its first workforce plan caught a skills gap before it became a hiring crisis.
Situation
Most companies under-invest in HR relative to headcount until something fails, usually a hiring crisis or a compliance gap found late. This holding company had reached that point. A three-person team attached to finance handled payroll, benefits and hiring. It had no HR specialists.
Strategic questions had no owner. Nobody was responsible for succession, for capability gaps or for culture. Finance leadership was absorbing HR escalations on top of its own work, and both functions were suffering for it.
What we did
We treated HR as a set of separate capabilities, each with its own build-or-buy decision. That is the logic of the HR business partner model. It avoids the false choice between staffing a full department and outsourcing everything.
| Capability | Decision | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | Build in-house | Needs judgment specific to the business |
| Performance management | Build in-house | Tied to how the company develops its own people |
| Payroll processing | Keep outsourced | A commoditized task a specialist vendor does better |
The company recruited a single HR generalist to anchor the function. That was the investment it could justify at its present size.
Impact
- HR now exists as its own function with named ownership of each capability, and finance has its capacity back.
- The new workforce planning process identified a skills gap developing in field operations. The company saw it early enough to act before it disrupted hiring.
- The model sets out which capabilities come next, so HR can grow in step with the business.
What made it work
We sized the function to current scale, not to an ambition several years out. One generalist with a clear remit was easier to approve and quicker to show value than a department would have been.
A dedicated HR function with a clear mandate, separate from finance
A first workforce planning process, which flagged a developing field-operations skills gap
A defined path for adding HR capability as the company grows
- Sector
- Industrial Holding
- Practice area
- Transformation & Organization
- Client profile
- Industrial holding company; HR run by a three-person finance team
- Services
- HR operating model, workforce planning, performance management design
This case study is a composite drawn from multiple engagements. Client details have been changed and combined to protect confidentiality, and figures are representative rather than attributable to any single client.
Facing a comparable challenge?
Tell us about your organization and we will route you to the right partner.
Standardizing Rig Move Execution Across a Fleet
Read case study →Redesigning Shift Operations Around Actual Workflow
Read case study →Realigning Sales and Delivery Around the Customer Journey
Read case study →A Scalable Job Architecture for a Multi-Acquisition Firm
Read case study →Building Leadership Capability Ahead of Scale
Read case study →Rebuilding Governance for a Public Infrastructure Authority
Read case study →The Hidden Cost of an Undocumented Operating Model
The org chart shows how work was meant to flow. How it really flows is usually written down nowhere.
Rig Move Efficiency Is a Leadership Problem
The gap between a fast rig move and a slow one is set in planning and briefing, well before the first truck arrives.
Designing Operations Around the Customer Experience
Customers do not see departments. They see what happens to their order as it passes between them.










