Structuring Public-Private Infrastructure Joint Ventures
A public-private infrastructure partnership is governed differently than a commercial joint venture, and the deal structure must answer to both.
Macro Context: Two Governance Standards at Once
Public-private infrastructure partnerships answer to two governance standards concurrently: the commercial return discipline a private partner's board expects, and the procurement transparency and public accountability a government infrastructure authority must satisfy under legislative and regulatory review. Neither standard can be treated as secondary without exposing the structure to failure at a later, more costly stage.
The Structural Challenge: Where a Commercial-Only Structure Stalls
A joint venture structure engineered purely around commercial terms — governance rights, return waterfalls, exit mechanics — consistently stalls at the procurement approval stage, where public accountability requirements were never built into the negotiation from the outset. Retrofitting procurement compliance onto an already-negotiated commercial structure is materially more costly than designing for both standards concurrently.
The Methodology: Governing the Introduction With the Same Rigor
The structure must answer to both standards directly: governance rights and decision authority calibrated to satisfy both a commercial board and a public procurement review, and a counterparty introduction process rigorous enough to withstand the same public scrutiny the authority itself answers to.
every counterparty introduction and the exchange of verification documents or counterparty details is governed by an executed Non-Circumvention Non-Disclosure Agreement (NCNDA) ahead of any information exchange, protecting both the private partner's commercial position and the public authority's procurement integrity.
- Qualify private-sector partners against both commercial capability and public-sector delivery experience before term-sheet discussions begin
- Structure governance rights that satisfy commercial return expectations and procurement transparency requirements concurrently, not sequentially
- Sequence the negotiation so procurement approval requirements are addressed alongside commercial terms from the outset, ahead of term-sheet execution
The Deterministic Outcome
A structure designed for both standards from the outset clears procurement review without renegotiating commercial terms already agreed. A structure designed for commercial terms alone forces a renegotiation under time pressure once the procurement gap surfaces, weakening the private partner's position at precisely the point leverage matters most.
Strategic Takeaways
- Qualify private-sector partners against both commercial capability and public-sector delivery experience
- Structure governance rights that satisfy commercial return expectations and procurement transparency requirements concurrently
- Execute Non-Circumvention Non-Disclosure Agreements (NCNDAs) ahead of any exchange of verification documents or counterparty details
Discuss this with our team.
Tell us what you are working through, and we will route you to the right partner.
Why Most Acquisitions Fail to Deliver Promised Synergies
Synergy realization begins precisely where deal-team accountability typically ends, and integration ownership must begin.
Due Diligence Beyond the Data Room
The figures a seller provides are, by definition, the figures a seller elected to disclose — not the complete picture.
Cross-Border Market Entry: Subsidiary vs. Agent Models
Agent-led market entry accelerates speed to market at the structural cost of a permanent ceiling on control.