Synergy Nexus Group
Industrial Trading

Building a Freight Procurement Model That Assumes Volatility

A freight budget built on last year's rates describes last year — it does not describe a plan for this one.

January 2021·3 min read·Synergy Nexus Trading

Rates as a Planning Assumption

Freight and logistics cost has historically been treated as a relatively stable input to industrial procurement budgets, adjusted incrementally year over year. That assumption has held up poorly in recent cycles, where capacity constraints and route disruptions have produced freight rate swings large enough to erase the margin on an otherwise well-negotiated purchase order.

A freight budget built on last year's rates describes last year — it does not describe a plan for this one.

Where the Model Breaks

The budgeting model breaks specifically at the point where freight is treated as a fixed line item, disconnected from the same market forces driving commodity price volatility. Buyers who model landed cost directly identify this exposure before it materializes as a margin surprise at delivery.

Building in the Buffer Deliberately

The corrective action is building a deliberate buffer into delivery timelines and landed-cost assumptions, and pre-qualifying alternate routes and carriers well ahead of any shipment that might require one.

Key takeaways
  • Model landed cost, including freight, when building procurement budgets
  • Treat freight as a variable input tied to the same market forces as the underlying commodity
  • Pre-qualify alternate routes and carriers ahead of a specific shipment requiring one

Discuss this with our team.

Tell us what you are working through, and we will route you to the right partner.